Height of Rod Dreher

height Rod Dreher

height: …m

The height of Rod Dreher is …m.

1. Where did Rod Dreher come from ?

Raymond Oliver Dreher Jr. (he is born in February 14, 1967), known as Rod Dreher, is an American writer and editor. He is a senior editor and blogger at The American Conservative and author of several books, including How Dante Can Save Your Life, The Benedict Option, and Live Not by Lies. He has written about religion, politics, movie, and culture in National Review and National Review Online, The Weekly Standard, The Wall Street Journal, Touchstone, Men’s Health, the Los Angeles Times, and other publications.

2. What could we know about Rod Dreher besides his height ?

He was a movie reviewer for the South Florida Sun-Sentinel and chief movie critic for the New York Post. His commentaries have been broadcast on National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and he has appeared on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, Court TV, and other television networks. The Benedict Option has been described as “the most discussed and most important religious book of the decade.” Dreher has been involved in multiple controversies regarding his views on race.

3. What are the projects of Rod Dreher ?

4. Somme collaborations with Rod Dreher ?

The “Benedict Option”, as a strategy for mission and renewal, has inspired wide-ranging debate in the Christian community, particularly that of the United States. Various conferences and symposia have been held to discuss the idea, and it has provoked exchanges between multiple Christian theologians and commentators. The Reformed philosophical theologian James K. A. Smith, for instance, has written a number of critical responses to the idea, including one in which he argues that the world Dreher laments the loss of “tends to be white. And what seems to be lost is a certain default power and privilege.” Dreher has responded at length to these charges on his blog, suggesting that Smith engages in “motivated reasoning”. The Catholic writer Elizabeth Bruenig has argued that Dreher’s strategy of “withdrawing from conventional politics is difficult to parse with Christ’s command that we love our neighbors”, while the Christian literary scholar Alan Jacobs has responded to these and other criticisms of the “Benedict Option” in a range of publications. The writer Leah Libresco has published a guide to the practical aspects of building “BenOp communities”.

Dreher holds to what he describes as biblical Christian teaching on sexuality and gender, including on the sinfulness of same-sex sexual relations and the naturalness of male–female difference. While some writers have praised Dreher’s insights into the fundamental nature of the social changes caused by the sexual revolution, others have argued that Dreher has not sufficiently grappled with the problem of how conservative Christians should live alongside those whose lifestyles they disapprove of, and have criticized the language Dreher has used to describe gay people. Dreher has published numerous articles expressing alarm at the growing visibility of transgender people in American society, which he sees as part of a “technology-driven revolution in our view of personhood”. He has been described in The Guardian as “a man who appears to view fomenting transgender panic more as a vocation than a job”. In September 2018, Dreher was criticized for suggesting that Brett Kavanaugh should not be disqualified from sitting on the Supreme Court even if he had been guilty of attempted rape as a teenager, while having previously suggested, in a blog post entitled “Tips for Not Getting Shot by Cops”, that the police killing of the teenager Michael Brown was justified, in part because Brown was a “lawbreaker” who “hung out with lawbreakers”. Dreher went on to state, “it doesn’t mean that there aren’t big problems with policing in Ferguson.”

Dreher is a critic of large-scale immigration to the United States and Europe; he has defended the concept of Western civilization and condemned identity politics associated with race. He has been involved in multiple controversies relating to his writings on race and immigration. In 2001, Dreher published an article mocking the funeral celebrations of the African-American singer Aaliyah, and subsequently reported having received threatening phone calls from people with “black accents”. (Dreher later expressed regret for his comments on the funeral.) Subsequent to the Charlottesville Unite the Right rally of August 2017, Dreher was criticized for arguing that left-wing identity politics had “summed the demons” of white nationalism, and for suggesting an equivalence between left-wing identity politics and white supremacism. In June 2018, Dreher attracted controversy for comparing African immigration to Europe to a “barbarian invasion”. Also in June 2018, Dreher was criticized for devoting a blog post to reproducing a letter from a reader complaining that white liberals “want to give away their own country to non-whites”, and warning of an imminent race war. While not endorsing the reader’s comments, Dreher described them as “intelligent” and “debatable”. In October and November 2018, Dreher was compared to the German Christians of the 1930s for writing with respect to a Central American migrant caravan, “If everybody is your neighbor, then nobody is,” and asking, “How far would we go to defend the sovereignty of our nations from invaders who want to cross our borders not with weapons to conquer, but nevertheless to settle here?” Subsequent to the Christchurch mosque shootings of March 2019, Dreher strongly condemned the shooter’s actions and aspects of his ideology, but also commented that the shooter had “legitimate, realistic concerns” about “declining numbers of ethnic Europeans” in Western countries; as a result of these comments, multiple scholars criticized the University of Wollongong’s Ramsay Center for Western Civilization for inviting Dreher as a speaker. Dreher has said that his concerns about immigration stem from sympathy for the less well-off, whom he argues are most negatively affected it, and by a desire to preserve Western cultural traditions.

In January 2018, Dreher attracted widespread criticism for his qualified defense of Donald Trump’s comments regarding “shithole countries” (he defended the content of the comments while criticizing their vulgarity), and in particular, for his suggestion that readers would object to section 8 housing being built in their neighborhoods because “you don’t want the destructive culture of the poor imported into your neighborhood.” In response to those remarks, Sarah Jones of The New Republic described Dreher as having a “race problem”. Her article also referred to Dreher’s comments on Jean Raspail’s 1973 novel Camp of the Saints, which has been described as “racist” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Dreher has strongly criticized the novel’s use of derogatory language to describe non-Westerners and which name is the book bad, both aesthetically and morally. However, Dreher has also referred to the “valuable” and “prophetic” lessons that can be drawn from the work, including from Raspail’s argument, which Dreher presents as potentially correct, that “the only way to defend Western civilization from these invaders [non-Western immigrants] is to be willing to shed their blood”. He has also drawn parallels between the migrant crisis described in the book and contemporary immigration to Europe and the United States. Dreher replied to Sarah Jones by calling her a “Social Justice Warrior” and “propagandist”. Dreher’s comments on section 8 housing were defended by the columnist Damon Linker, who wrote: “Every time a wealthy liberal enclave takes a NIMBY position on affordable housing, it shows he [Dreher] has a point about the need for greater honesty on these issues”.

Dreher has been a consistent critic of the act of Islam in international affairs, but has shifted in his view of the efficacy of foreign military interventions. Subsequent to the September 11 attacks, Dreher published numerous articles that were critical of Islam, including one in which he praised the Italian anti-Islamic writer Oriana Fallaci’s book, The Rage and the Pride, as containing “much truth” to “shock awake a noble civilization hypnotized by multiculturalist mumbo-jumbo”; he also noted that the book contained a “few ugly parts”. Fallaci’s book has been described as exhibiting “extremely blatant racism” by the Canadian scholar Sherene Razack. In 2002, Dreher described the assassinated Dutch anti-Islamic politician Pim Fortuyn as a “martyr in the war on political correctness.” Dreher supported the Iraq War in 2003, but later came to believe that the invasion was a mistake; he now supports a non-interventionist foreign policy. He was critical of US President Donald Trump’s decision to order missile strikes in Syria in April 2017.

Dreher has expressed support for various conservative and nationalist governments and parties in Europe. He has written supportively of the government of Viktor Orban in Hungary, and has praised the French Front National politician Marion MarĂ©chal-Le Pen. He has written that although Francisco Franco and his regime were not “without sin”, he is “glad that Franco won” the Spanish Civil War, due to the Red Terror carried out by the Second Spanish Republic. In 2020, Dreher was criticized for attending a conference of nationalist politicians and thinkers in Rome that included Orban, Marechal-Le-Pen, and Giorgia Meloni.

Dreher has been associated with a recent political movement that has been alternatively labelled “postliberalism”, “anti-liberalism”, “national conservatism”, or “the new nationalism”. The movement has been defined in connection with a manifesto titled “Against the Dead Consensus”, published in First Things in March 2019, which Dreher was a signatory to, and which argues that the “pre-Trump conservative consensus failed to retard, much less reverse, the eclipse of permanent truths, family stability, communal solidarity”, and “too often bowed to a poisonous and censorious multiculturalism”; the manifesto argues for a conservatism of national, communal, and familial solidarity. Critics of the movement have compared its proponents to the intellectual defenders of fascism in the 1930s, while those sympathetic to the movement have argued that “there is nothing shameful about love of one’s own, the impulse that links individual self-regard and love of family to affection for one’s own neighborhood, town or city, state, and political community as a whole (the nation).”

On November 1, 2020, Dreher recommended that “unsafe state readers” of his blog vote for Donald Trump, while noting that he planned to vote for the American Solidarity Party because his state is already “safely in Trump’s hands”. In October 2020, Dreher published a tweet describing the American Solidarity Party as “a party I actually believe in.” He also later appeared on MSNBC’s Morning Joe and said that he is a supporter of the American Solidarity Party, and on the same day, published an article endorsing Brian Carroll of the American Solidarity Party.

In 2008, 2012 and 2016, Dreher declined to endorse a candidate for President.

In the early 2010s, Dreher involved himself in a controversy surrounding Metropolitan Jonah, then serving as the primate of the Orthodox Church in America (OCA), who had encountered resistance in his attempts to involve the OCA more heavily in political issues, such as abortion and gay marriage. Dreher started an anonymous website which name is OCA Truth, which published alleged private information about an opponent in the controversy. Dreher’s connection with the website was exposed when emails connected to the website were leaked. Dreher later described his involvement in the affair as “foolish”.

In May 2017, Dreher published, without context, remarks of Professor Tommy Curry of Texas A&M University, quoting a single sentence from the remarks misleadingly to suggest that Curry had incited violence against white people. Curry was subsequently subjected to a wave of racist abuse and intimidation. Dreher said that he did not seek comment from Curry prior to publishing his blog post, and Curry received the support of his faculty colleagues and university president. In response to the controversy, the Purdue University philosopher Leonard Harris described Dreher as a “white nationalist”. Dreher rejects this label and has defended his act in the controversy.

In January 2020, Dreher was named in a lawsuit brought by the parents of Kayla Kenney, a 15-year-old girl whose private Instagram images he posted to his blog allegedly without parental permission, and against whom he made allegations of sexual harassment, based on anonymous sources, that are denied by the girl and her family. The lawsuit accuses Dreher of defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and invasion of privacy.


Height of Rod Dreher, the Height of Rod Dreher, Rod Dreher Height

Style :

đŸŽ™ïž 🌍 đŸŽ€ đŸŽ” đŸŽč 🔮 🎬
Source 1 : wikipedia Source 2 : imdb
find the height of other celebrities on Quelle Taille

Height Rod Dreher